1962 Abarth 600 vs. 2013 Volkswagen CC
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen CC is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Volkswagen CC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen CC (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 600. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen CC should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen CC weights approximately 940 kg more than 1962 Abarth 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen CC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen CC (281 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 600. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Volkswagen CC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 600. 2013 Volkswagen CC has automatic transmission and 1962 Abarth 600 has manual transmission. 1962 Abarth 600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen CC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 600 | 2013 Volkswagen CC | |
| Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
| Model | 600 | CC |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 92 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 583 kg | 1523 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4799 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1855 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2711 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
