1962 Abarth 700 vs. 2004 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 700. (63 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 1053 kg more than 1962 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 700. (69 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 700.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 700 | 2004 Buick LeSabre | |
Make | Abarth | Buick |
Model | 700 | LeSabre |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 696 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 312 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 576 kg | 1629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |