1962 Abarth 750 vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 4,687 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 900 kg more than 1962 Abarth 750.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Abarth 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 750. (57 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 750. 2000 Dodge Durango has automatic transmission and 1962 Abarth 750 has manual transmission. 1962 Abarth 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Dodge Durango will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 750 | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 750 | Durango |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 4687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 57 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2950 mm |