1962 Abarth 750 vs. 2004 Ford Mondeo

To start off, 2004 Ford Mondeo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mondeo (153 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 750. (43 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 943 kg more than 1962 Abarth 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Abarth 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mondeo (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 750. (57 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 750.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Abarth 750 2004 Ford Mondeo
Make Abarth Ford
Model 750 Mondeo
Year Released 1962 2004
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 747 cc 2302 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 43 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 57 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 61 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 64 mm 94.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 17.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 535 kg 1478 kg
Vehicle Length 3300 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1390 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 58 L