1962 AC Aceca vs. 1949 Allard J
To start off, 1962 AC Aceca is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Aceca weights approximately 30 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1949 Allard J | |
Make | AC | Allard |
Model | Aceca | J |
Year Released | 1962 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 113 L |