1962 AC Aceca vs. 1949 Buick 40
To start off, 1962 AC Aceca is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 1074 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1949 Buick 40 | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Aceca | 40 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 5249 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 109.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1865 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3000 mm |