1962 AC Aceca vs. 1951 DKW F 89
To start off, 1962 AC Aceca is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Aceca weights approximately 30 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1951 DKW F 89 | |
Make | AC | DKW |
Model | Aceca | F 89 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2360 mm |