1962 AC Aceca vs. 1964 Austin A 90

To start off, 1964 Austin A 90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 90 weights approximately 678 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

1962 AC Aceca 1964 Austin A 90
Make AC Austin
Model Aceca A 90
Year Released 1962 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 2912 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 125 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4750 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 221 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 894 kg 1572 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 34 L