1962 AC Aceca vs. 1970 Audi Super 90
To start off, 1970 Audi Super 90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Aceca (209 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 1962 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 1970 Audi Super 90 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | Super 90 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1759 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 84.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2500 mm |
