1962 AC Aceca vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 1978 Mazda 929 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda 929 weights approximately 176 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | 929 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |