1962 AC Aceca vs. 1982 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1982 Ford Falcon is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 476 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

1962 AC Aceca 1982 Ford Falcon
Make AC Ford
Model Aceca Falcon
Year Released 1962 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 3271 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 125 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 894 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2830 mm