1962 AC Aceca vs. 1984 BMW 316

To start off, 1984 BMW 316 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1984 BMW 316. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1984 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 BMW 316 weights approximately 199 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Aceca (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 BMW 316. (140 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

1962 AC Aceca 1984 BMW 316
Make AC BMW
Model Aceca 316
Year Released 1962 1984
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2553 cc 1767 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 168 HP 88 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 71 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 791 kg 990 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4330 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 55 L