1962 AC Aceca vs. 1990 Daihatsu Mira
To start off, 1990 Daihatsu Mira is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (168 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Aceca weights approximately 116 kg more than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Daihatsu Mira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 1990 Daihatsu Mira | |
| Make | AC | Daihatsu |
| Model | Aceca | Mira |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 659 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 60.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2180 mm |
