1962 AC Aceca vs. 1992 BMW 850
To start off, 1992 BMW 850 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 BMW 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 850 (295 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 850 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 850 (447 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1992 BMW 850 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | 850 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |