1962 AC Aceca vs. 1995 Chrysler Cirrus
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Cirrus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus (164 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Cirrus weights approximately 433 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus (221 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1995 Chrysler Cirrus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1995 Chrysler Cirrus | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | Cirrus |
Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4350 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1327 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |