1962 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 799 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 1997 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | AC | Daewoo |
| Model | Aceca | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4960 mm |
