1962 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Isuzu 3.1
To start off, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1997 Isuzu 3.1 | |
Make | AC | Isuzu |
Model | Aceca | 3.1 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |