1962 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 342 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 859 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Aceca (209 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1962 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Aceca | Helem |
Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 510 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |