1962 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | |
| Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Aceca | GTO |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2730 mm |
