1962 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | R 391 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |