1962 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Hummer H1
To start off, 2000 Hummer H1 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Hummer H1 (195 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Because 2000 Hummer H1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hummer H1 (583 Nm) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2000 Hummer H1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2000 Hummer H1 | |
Make | AC | Hummer |
Model | Aceca | H1 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 6500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 583 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3310 mm |