1962 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2001 Ford Windstar is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2001 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Windstar.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 2001 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3066 mm |
