1962 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Tata Aria
To start off, 2001 Tata Aria is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (168 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2001 Tata Aria. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Tata Aria.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Tata Aria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 2001 Tata Aria | |
| Make | AC | Tata |
| Model | Aceca | Aria |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 140 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
