1962 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 819 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Aceca | F-1 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |