1962 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1159 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder (360 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2003 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 81.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |