1962 AC Aceca vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 SsangYong Korando (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | AC | SsangYong |
Model | Aceca | Korando |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |