1962 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 507 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 2004 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 239 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 85 L |
