1962 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Italdesign Visconti
To start off, 2004 Italdesign Visconti is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Italdesign Visconti (399 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Italdesign Visconti should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Because 2004 Italdesign Visconti is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Italdesign Visconti will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Italdesign Visconti (680 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 471 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Italdesign Visconti will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Aceca | 2004 Italdesign Visconti | |
| Make | AC | Italdesign |
| Model | Aceca | Visconti |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 399 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 680 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2830 mm |
