1962 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2004 Jeep Liberty is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Liberty (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Liberty weights approximately 864 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Liberty (319 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2004 Jeep Liberty | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Aceca | Liberty |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 74 L |