1962 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1681 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Aceca | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 8276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 691 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 2472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 98 L |