1962 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1494 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | Armada |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 106 L |