1962 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Audi A6
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (178 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2009 Audi A6 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | A6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 178 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2833 mm |