1962 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Aceca | Cruze |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2685 mm |