1962 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 408. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | AC | Peugeot |
Model | Aceca | 408 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |