1962 AC Aceca vs. 2011 BMW 120

To start off, 2011 BMW 120 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 168 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW 120 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 120 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

1962 AC Aceca 2011 BMW 120
Make AC BMW
Model Aceca 120
Year Released 1962 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2553 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 168 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 16.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 791 kg 1326 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1440 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 51 L