1962 AC Cobra vs. 1956 Skoda 1200
To start off, 1962 AC Cobra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1956 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1956 Skoda 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Skoda 1200 weights approximately 26 kg more than 1962 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Cobra (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Skoda 1200. (74 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Cobra | 1956 Skoda 1200 | |
Make | AC | Skoda |
Model | Cobra | 1200 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2690 mm |