1962 AC Cobra vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 321 kg more than 1962 AC Cobra.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Cobra (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Cobra | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Cobra | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2380 mm |