1962 AC Cobra vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 66 kg more than 1962 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Cobra | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | AC | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Cobra | Murena |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4265 cc | 2154 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 91.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2440 mm |
