1962 AC Cobra vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Cobra would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1962 AC Cobra. (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Cobra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1488 kg more than 1962 AC Cobra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Cobra. (365 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Cobra | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Cobra | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 8276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 691 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 2472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 98 L |