1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1949 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1962 AC Greyhound is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 95 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1949 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Greyhound | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1962 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2040 mm |