1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1950 Austin A 90
To start off, 1962 AC Greyhound is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 90. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 90 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 Austin A 90 (191 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1950 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1950 Austin A 90 | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Greyhound | A 90 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 191 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 34 L |