1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1951 Austin A
To start off, 1962 AC Greyhound is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1951 Austin A. (29 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 330 kg more than 1951 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A. (54 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1951 Austin A | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Greyhound | A |
Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 29 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 54 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 48 L |