1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1962 AC Greyhound is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 45 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1952 Holden FX | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Greyhound | FX |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
