1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1953 AC Ace
To start off, 1962 AC Greyhound is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1953 AC Ace. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1953 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 253 kg more than 1953 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 AC Ace. (149 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1953 AC Ace | |
Make | AC | AC |
Model | Greyhound | Ace |
Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 149 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |