1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1954 Austin A 40
To start off, 1962 AC Greyhound is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 40 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1954 Austin A 40 | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Greyhound | A 40 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 79 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |