1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1959 Ford 17M
To start off, 1962 AC Greyhound is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford 17M weights approximately 100 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1959 Ford 17M | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | 17M |
Year Released | 1962 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 120 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |