1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1964 Zastava 1500 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 31 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | AC | Zastava |
| Model | Greyhound | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |
