1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1966 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1966 Jaguar E-Type is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 230 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1966 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1966 Jaguar E-Type | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Greyhound | E-Type |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 385 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 63 L |
