1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1968 Ford 17
To start off, 1968 Ford 17 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford 17 (185 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1968 Ford 17 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1968 Ford 17 | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | 17 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 41 L |
