1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1971 Austin 3
To start off, 1971 Austin 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Austin 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Austin 3 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Austin 3 (218 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1971 Austin 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1971 Austin 3 | |
| Make | AC | Austin |
| Model | Greyhound | 3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |
